0 of 16 Questions completed
Questions:
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading…
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You must first complete the following:
0 of 16 Questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 point(s), (0)
Earned Point(s): 0 of 0, (0)
0 Essay(s) Pending (Possible Point(s): 0)
Without Acts, the New Testament would be complete.
Luke was not a professional researcher.
List from the commentary the five reasons we can believe Luke wrote Acts:
This response will be awarded full points automatically, but it can be reviewed and adjusted after submission.
Acts contains about 12 references to the Holy Spirit.
Acts as a historical account is unique.
All of the sermons in Acts are built on the resurrection.
Ananias and Sapphira received a mild form of discipline because of their treachery.
Paul’s second missionary journey took place about A.D. 53-57.
Luke’s history sets exact dates.
Luke’s use of “we” indicates that he was personally involved in what journeys:
This response will be awarded full points automatically, but it can be reviewed and adjusted after submission.
Luke’s Gospel and Acts are not related because of the dedication of these two books to Theophilus.
Which statement presents the idea that the Gospel of Luke was written before A.D. 59-61?
There is no indication where Luke composed Acts.
There is an explainable answer as to why Luke, capable of writing excellent Greek, presents grammar that is incomplete and defective.
The content of the book is much broader than the proposed title of “Acts” conveys.
Christians in the first century placed Acts in the category of historical books.
